By Kepher Otieno - Reporter
Kenya, 4 July 2026 - Kenya's ambitious plan to build its first nuclear power plant has encountered its first significant obstacle, not from technology or financing, but from the community expected to host the multibillion-shilling investment.
What was intended to be a public participation exercise in Nango, Central Sakwa, quickly evolved into a powerful demonstration that local trust may ultimately determine whether the proposed nuclear project proceeds.
Residents halted the engagement, insisting that elected leaders, opinion leaders and community elders—not external consultants—must lead discussions on a project expected to reshape the region's economy for generations.
Their message was simple. Development cannot be imposed. It must be negotiated through trusted leadership.
"We are not rejecting the project," said Nango Market Chairperson Rose Manowa.
"We are rejecting the process. Our leaders must be at the forefront before anyone asks us to support such a major investment."
The protest exposes a governance challenge facing Kenya's largest planned energy investment. While government sees nuclear power as the engine that will drive industrialisation and guarantee long-term electricity security, communities want assurances that their voices will influence decisions affecting their land, livelihoods and future.
Residents questioned why a roadshow organised by We Planet Africa carried banners proclaiming support for nuclear power even before consultations had begun.
To them, the messaging suggested the outcome had already been predetermined.
Others expressed concern that discussions had focused almost entirely on the economic benefits while giving little attention to potential environmental, health and social risks.
Consolata Orimba said communities deserved balanced information before being asked to endorse the proposal.
"The advantages have been explained, but where are the discussions about the risks?" she asked.
The concerns extend beyond safety.
Residents fear displacement within the proposed eight-kilometre buffer zone could disrupt fishing on Lake Victoria, agriculture and small-scale gold mining that sustain thousands of households.
Such anxieties underline a familiar reality in large infrastructure projects: communities often judge investments less by their economic value than by how fairly the costs and benefits are shared.
The proposed nuclear power station represents one of Kenya's most ambitious infrastructure investments.
Valued at more than KSh 500 billion ($3.9 billion), the 2,000-megawatt facility is expected to begin construction in 2027 before becoming operational in 2034. The project forms part of President William Ruto's strategy to expand Kenya's electricity generation capacity from about 3,300 megawatts to at least 10,000 megawatts, positioning nuclear energy as a cornerstone of the country's industrial transformation.
More from Kenya
For investors, however, social acceptance is increasingly recognised as critical infrastructure.
Without what experts describe as a "social licence to operate", even technically sound and financially viable projects can face costly delays, legal disputes and reputational risks.
Project Coordinator Peter Gichuki of We Planet Africa acknowledged shortcomings in the initial engagement, admitting local political and opinion leaders should have been involved from the outset.
He described the events in Nango as a wake-up call.
"We have listened to the community. Going forward, we must engage leaders whom the people trust and communicate in language they understand," he said.
He also sought to address fears surrounding radiation, explaining that radioactive materials remain contained within reactor systems and that modern nuclear facilities are designed with multiple layers of safety and continuous monitoring.
The President of the Kenyan Young Generation in Nuclear, Linet Kerubo Nyamweya, echoed that message, promising more extensive stakeholder engagement and assuring affected landowners that any compulsory acquisition would be accompanied by compensation in accordance with government policy.
Even so, confidence remains fragile.
Residents questioned why senior county leaders, including their Member of Parliament, Member of County Assembly and Governor, had not personally addressed the community over a project that could fundamentally alter the county's economic landscape.
Governor James Orengo has publicly welcomed the investment, describing it as a transformative opportunity capable of positioning Siaya at the centre of Kenya's future industrial economy.
Yet events in Nango suggest that political endorsement alone will not secure community acceptance.
For Kenya, the lesson extends beyond Siaya.
As the country accelerates investment in mega infrastructure projects, winning public confidence may prove as important as securing engineering expertise or financial backing.
In Nango, the debate is no longer simply about nuclear energy.
It is about trust, transparency and whether communities can become genuine partners in shaping one of Kenya's biggest economic investments rather than passive recipients of decisions made elsewhere.