By Francis Onyach - Reporter
Kenya, Aril 26, 2026 - The ongoing turmoil within the Football Kenya Federation (FKF) has escalated to the global stage, with FIFA formally intervening and demanding urgent clarification over the controversial decision to sideline top federation officials.
The crisis began on April 24, 2026, when FKF’s National Executive Committee (NEC) passed a resolution requiring three senior officials to step aside:
- President Hussein Rashid Mohammed
- Acting General Secretary Dennis Gicheru
- NEC member Abdullahi Yussuf Ibrahim
The decision was reportedly supported by a majority of NEC members and was aimed at paving the way for investigations into alleged financial mismanagement, including claims surrounding approximately KSh 42 million linked to the African Nations Championship (CHAN).
The resolution effectively removed the trio from their duties on a provisional basis, triggering a major governance crisis within Kenyan football.
In response, FIFA, working alongside the Confederation of African Football (CAF), has launched an official assessment into the circumstances surrounding the decision.
In a formal letter addressed to FKF, FIFA made it clear that its primary concern is whether due process and the federation’s own statutes were followed in adopting the resolution.
The global body emphasized that it is seeking a “clear and accurate understanding” of both the decision-making process and its legal compliance under FKF rules.
FIFA has set a strict deadline of May 1, 2026, for FKF to submit detailed explanations and supporting documentation.
Among the critical issues raised are:
1. Right to a Fair Hearing
FIFA wants confirmation on whether the affected officials were given an opportunity to defend themselves before the resolution was passed.
This touches on fundamental governance principles such as fairness, transparency, and due process.
2. Legitimacy of the NEC Process
The world governing body is scrutinizing whether:
- The NEC meeting was properly convened
- Required quorum and voting procedures were met
- The decision aligned with FKF statutes (notably Articles 38, 40, and 41)
More from Kenya
3. Agenda and Motion Procedure
FIFA has specifically requested:
- Evidence of any formal proposal submitted to include the motion for provisional dismissal on the agenda
- Documentation showing how the resolution was introduced and approved.
4. Supporting Documentation
FKF must also provide:
- Meeting notices and attendance records
- Voting outcomes
- Correspondence and materials used in making the decision.
FIFA’s involvement signals serious concern over governance standards within Kenyan football. Historically, FIFA has taken strict action against member associations that violate statutes or political and administrative independence rules.
If the FKF process is found to have breached regulations, possible consequences could include:
- Reversal of the NEC decision
- Disciplinary action against officials involved
- In extreme cases, sanctions or suspension of the federation
This is particularly sensitive given Kenya’s past issues with football governance, including previous suspensions that disrupted international participation.
With the May 1 deadline looming, FKF faces intense pressure to justify its actions and demonstrate compliance with its constitution. The outcome of FIFA’s review will likely determine:
- Whether the suspended officials are reinstated or formally removed
- The credibility of FKF’s leadership structures
- The future stability of football administration in Kenya
The FKF crisis has quickly evolved from an internal dispute into a high-stakes governance issue under global scrutiny. FIFA’s demand for accountability highlights the importance of procedural integrity in football administration.
As investigations continue, the decisions made in the coming days could reshape the leadership of Kenyan football, and potentially define its relationship with international governing bodies for years to come.