Kenya, 24 November 2025 - Tensions have flared in Parliament as the Senate’s Committee on Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations intensifies its scrutiny of county governments’ banking practices.
The spotlight is currently on Nairobi County, where lawmakers are raising serious concerns over the shift of public funds, unexplained accounts, and possible politicization of financial management.
According to reports from the Controller of Budget, counties in Kenya collectively maintain more than 5,400 commercial bank accounts, many allegedly outside authorised frameworks.
During committee hearings, senators argued this proliferation of accounts places public funds at risk, reducing transparency and exposing critical weaknesses in how county money is managed.
The Senate is demanding real-time access to these accounts for key oversight bodies like the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), the Auditor-General, and the Controller of Budget.
Yet, as CBK Governor Kamau Thugge has told the committee, a regulatory gap means the Bank lacks clear power to force counties to close unauthorised accounts.
The Public Finance Management (PFM) Act, he said, does not explicitly give CBK enforcement authority, a loophole that critics call deeply problematic.
Nairobi’s Controversial Cash Reallocation
At the heart of the issue is a controversial banking decision made by Governor Johnson Sakaja.
Nairobi County moved funds belonging to its health facilities from Co-operative Bank, a large and well-established institution, to Sidian Bank, a smaller “tier‑three” bank.
Critics have panned the move as “politicized” and risky, raising red flags over why public money would be shifted to a less stable banking partner.
Senator Edwin Sifuna has been particularly vocal, accusing the county government of prioritizing political alliances over sound financial management.
He argues that switching significant public funds to a smaller bank increases risk and could undermine trust in how Nairobi handles its budget.
Public Frustration and Political Fault Lines
On social media and public forums, debates around the banking controversy are deeply emotional.
One user on social media wrote of systemic misuse of county funds, describing how billions disappear in accounts that are difficult to monitor.
Others express a broader disillusionment with devolution, suggesting the system was meant to empower locals but now enables waste and politicized decisions.
More from Kenya
This frustration cuts across political lines: it is not just about a single governor or party but a broader concern that devolved governments lack the financial discipline and oversight needed to protect public money.
Real Risk for Public Finance
The issues being raised by the Senate are not purely technical, they carry real financial and political risk.
Without effective regulation, unauthorised bank accounts could be used for opaque spending or even misuse. The lack of real-time access for oversight institutions makes it harder to detect and prevent corruption or financial mismanagement.
Shifting large sums to smaller banks like Sidian could expose Nairobi’s public funds to bank-specific risks, including liquidity or default issues.
These dynamics could erode the credibility of devolution, especially in Nairobi, where citizens expect better governance and effective use of local revenue.
What Needs to Happen to Restore Trust
To address these concerns, several bold moves are needed. Parliament must close the regulatory loophole that limits CBK’s power to enforce compliance with account guidelines.
The Senate’s push for real-time dashboard access to county bank accounts should be implemented without delay.
All county-held commercial accounts should be audited, inactive accounts closed, and unused funds consolidated to reduce risk.
Nairobi’s government must publicly justify the banking switch, explaining how it serves efficiency and safeguards public money rather than political interests.
Finally, counties should develop internal financial management systems with strong checks to ensure transparent and accountable fund flows.
The current Senate investigation isn’t just about banking software or account titles, it is a fundamental test of Kenya’s devolution model.
If the financial structures of devolved governments remain opaque, the dream of local development risks being compromised.
For Nairobi, how this banking controversy is resolved could define both its fiscal health and its credibility in local governance.

More from Kenya
Erta Ale Volcano Erupts with Violent Force in Ethiopia’s Afar Region

Trump’s Aid Reset Sends Shockwaves: Has Kenya’s KSh7 Billion MCC Mobility Grant Really Been Terminated?





